<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Standards for Object Databases?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.odbms.org/blog/2007/12/what-standards-for-object-databases/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2007/12/what-standards-for-object-databases/</link>
	<description>Trends and Information on New Data Management Technologies, Innovation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 22:54:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2007/12/what-standards-for-object-databases/comment-page-1/#comment-91</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 13:27:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.odbms.org/odbmsblog/2007/12/19/what-standards-for-object-databases/#comment-91</guid>
		<description>In reply to the original comments:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I don&#039;t think it&#039;s true that most of the original OODB systems didn&#039;t&lt;br /&gt;support query optimization or transactions.  It depends a bit on what&lt;br /&gt;you mean by &quot;original&quot;, but if you mean the generation of companies&lt;br /&gt;that appeared in 1988, I don&#039;t think it&#039;s true.  ObjectStore&lt;br /&gt;absolutely always supported ACID transactions.  It also had a query&lt;br /&gt;optimizer, albeit a simple one, without any impendence mismatch.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;You say that relational data maps fairly well to objects, but there&lt;br /&gt;are a lot of big problems, which have been written about at great&lt;br /&gt;length.  For example, it is difficult to model inheritance in&lt;br /&gt;relational databases.  This is not a &quot;fine point&quot;; it&#039;s crucial.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to the original comments:</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s true that most of the original OODB systems didn&#8217;t<br />support query optimization or transactions.  It depends a bit on what<br />you mean by &#8220;original&#8221;, but if you mean the generation of companies<br />that appeared in 1988, I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s true.  ObjectStore<br />absolutely always supported ACID transactions.  It also had a query<br />optimizer, albeit a simple one, without any impendence mismatch.</p>
<p>You say that relational data maps fairly well to objects, but there<br />are a lot of big problems, which have been written about at great<br />length.  For example, it is difficult to model inheritance in<br />relational databases.  This is not a &#8220;fine point&#8221;; it&#8217;s crucial.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

