Comments on: Do we really need a standard for Object Databases? http://www.odbms.org/blog/2009/04/do-we-really-need-standard-for-object/ Trends and Information on Objects and Databases, Object Persistence, Innovation Fri, 02 Apr 2010 08:48:41 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Roberto V. Zicari http://www.odbms.org/blog/2009/04/do-we-really-need-standard-for-object/comment-page-1/#comment-12 Roberto V. Zicari Tue, 12 May 2009 02:28:45 +0000 http://www.odbms.org/odbmsblog/2009/04/17/do-we-really-need-a-standard-for-object-databases/#comment-12 Paul<br />I am not sure.<br />Distributed cache technologies are fine, but sometimes you really need a full-fledge database.<br /><br />Your BusinessEvents Query Language (BQL) seems interesting though.<br /><br />RVZ Paul
I am not sure.
Distributed cache technologies are fine, but sometimes you really need a full-fledge database.

Your BusinessEvents Query Language (BQL) seems interesting though.

RVZ

]]> By: Paul Vincent http://www.odbms.org/blog/2009/04/do-we-really-need-standard-for-object/comment-page-1/#comment-13 Paul Vincent Mon, 11 May 2009 06:21:07 +0000 http://www.odbms.org/odbmsblog/2009/04/17/do-we-really-need-a-standard-for-object-databases/#comment-13 Excellent qu. <br /><br />Perhaps ODBMS requirements are being addressed by distributed cache technologies, [eg: use of an OODB in some other technology as referenced in <br /><a href="http://tibcoblogs.com/cep/2009/03/30/is-cep-a-bird-plane-or-oodb/" rel="nofollow">is-cep-a-bird-plane-or-oodb</a> ] <br />and/or we are at a(nother) "technology tipping point"? [eg: support for continuous queries, as referenced in <br /><a href="http://tibcoblogs.com/cep/2009/04/26/anyone-noticed-the-stream-of-support-for-continuous-queries/" rel="nofollow">anyone-noticed-the-stream-of-support-for-continuous-queries</a> ]<br /><br />S/w vendors are always interested in supporting standards, as these benefit customers. Hopefully OQL/OQL's successor will progress and provide value...<br /><br />Cheers Excellent qu.

Perhaps ODBMS requirements are being addressed by distributed cache technologies, [eg: use of an OODB in some other technology as referenced in
is-cep-a-bird-plane-or-oodb ]
and/or we are at a(nother) “technology tipping point”? [eg: support for continuous queries, as referenced in
anyone-noticed-the-stream-of-support-for-continuous-queries ]

S/w vendors are always interested in supporting standards, as these benefit customers. Hopefully OQL/OQL’s successor will progress and provide value…

Cheers

]]>