Comments on: Do we really need a standard for Object Databases? http://www.odbms.org/blog/2009/04/do-we-really-need-standard-for-object/ Trends and Information on Big Data, New Data Management Technologies, Data Science and Innovation. Mon, 03 Nov 2014 17:39:20 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.4 By: Roberto V. Zicari http://www.odbms.org/blog/2009/04/do-we-really-need-standard-for-object/#comment-99 Tue, 12 May 2009 02:28:45 +0000 http://www.odbms.org/odbmsblog/2009/04/17/do-we-really-need-a-standard-for-object-databases/#comment-99 Paul
I am not sure.
Distributed cache technologies are fine, but sometimes you really need a full-fledge database.

Your BusinessEvents Query Language (BQL) seems interesting though.

RVZ

]]>
By: Paul Vincent http://www.odbms.org/blog/2009/04/do-we-really-need-standard-for-object/#comment-100 Mon, 11 May 2009 06:21:07 +0000 http://www.odbms.org/odbmsblog/2009/04/17/do-we-really-need-a-standard-for-object-databases/#comment-100 Excellent qu.

Perhaps ODBMS requirements are being addressed by distributed cache technologies, [eg: use of an OODB in some other technology as referenced in
is-cep-a-bird-plane-or-oodb ]
and/or we are at a(nother) “technology tipping point”? [eg: support for continuous queries, as referenced in
anyone-noticed-the-stream-of-support-for-continuous-queries ]

S/w vendors are always interested in supporting standards, as these benefit customers. Hopefully OQL/OQL’s successor will progress and provide value…

Cheers

]]>