<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ODBMS Industry Watch &#187; Java</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.odbms.org/blog/tag/java/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.odbms.org/blog</link>
	<description>Trends and Information on New Data Management Technologies, Innovation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 11:46:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Interview with Iran Hutchinson, Globals.</title>
		<link>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2011/06/interview-with-iran-hutchinson-globals/</link>
		<comments>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2011/06/interview-with-iran-hutchinson-globals/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 22:06:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Roberto V. Zicari</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Caché]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Globals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[InterSystems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran Hutchinson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Java Object Persistence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JavaScript]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multi-dimensional arrays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nosql databases]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.odbms.org/blog/?p=820</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“ The newly launched Globals initiative is not about creating a new database. It is however, about exposing the core multi-dimensional arrays directly to developers.” &#8212; Iran Hutchinson. __________________________ InterSystems recently launched a new initiative: Globals. I wanted to know more about Globals. I have therefore interviewed Iran Hutchinson, software/systems architect at InterSystems and one [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2011/06/interview-with-iran-hutchinson-globals/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>O/R Impedance Mismatch? Users Speak Up! Third Series of User Reports published.</title>
		<link>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2008/10/or-impedance-mismatch-users-speak-up-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2008/10/or-impedance-mismatch-users-speak-up-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 02:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Roberto V. Zicari</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impedence mismatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Java Object Persistence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[object persistence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ODBMS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.odbms.org/odbmsblog/2008/10/23/or-impedance-mismatch-users-speak-up-third-series-of-user-reports-published/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have published the third series of user reports on using technologies for storing and handling persistent objects.I have defined &#8220;users&#8221; in a very broad sense, including: CTOs, Technical Directors, Software Architects, Consultants, Developers, and Researchers. The third series includes 7 new user reports from the following users:- Peter Train, Architect, Standard Bank Group Limited, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2008/10/or-impedance-mismatch-users-speak-up-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LINQ: the best option for a future Java query API?</title>
		<link>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2008/10/is-really-linq-best-option-for-future/</link>
		<comments>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2008/10/is-really-linq-best-option-for-future/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 04:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Roberto V. Zicari</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Java Object Persistence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LINQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ODBMS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ODBTWG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OMG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.odbms.org/odbmsblog/2008/10/07/linq-the-best-option-for-a-future-java-query-api/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My interview to Mike Card has triggered an intense discussion (still ongoing), on the pros and cons of considering LINQ as the best option for a future Java query API. There is a consensus that a common query mechanism for odbms is needed. However, there is quite a disagreement on how this should be done. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2008/10/is-really-linq-best-option-for-future/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Do you have an impedance mismatch problem? Users speak up! Second series of user reports published.</title>
		<link>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2008/09/second-series-of-user-reports-published/</link>
		<comments>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2008/09/second-series-of-user-reports-published/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 05:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Roberto V. Zicari</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impedence mismatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[object persistence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ODBMS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.odbms.org/odbmsblog/2008/09/04/do-you-have-an-impedance-mismatch-problem-users-speak-up-second-series-of-user-reports-published/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have started a new series of interviews with users of technologies for storing and handling persistent objects, around the globe. 6 additional user reports (12-17/08) have been published, from the following users: Ajay Deshpande, Persistent Horst Braeuner, City of Schwaebisch Hall Tore Risch, Uppsala University Michael Blaha, OMT Associates Stefan Keller, HSR Rapperswil Mohammed [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2008/09/second-series-of-user-reports-published/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LINQ is the best option for a future Java query API</title>
		<link>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2008/08/linq-is-best-option-for-future-java/</link>
		<comments>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2008/08/linq-is-best-option-for-future-java/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 12:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Roberto V. Zicari</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LINQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ODBMS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ODBTWG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OMG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.odbms.org/odbmsblog/2008/08/27/linq-is-the-best-option-for-a-future-java-query-api/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A conversation with Mike Card. I have interviewed Mike Card on the latest development of the OMG working group which aims at defining a new standards for Object Database Systems. Mike works with Syracuse Research Corporation (SRC) and is involved in object databases and their application to challenging problems, including pattern recognition. He chairs the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2008/08/linq-is-best-option-for-future-java/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>72</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Do you have an impedance mismatch problem? Users speak up!</title>
		<link>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2008/07/do-you-have-impedance-mismatch-problem/</link>
		<comments>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2008/07/do-you-have-impedance-mismatch-problem/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 01:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Roberto V. Zicari</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impedence mismatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[object persistence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ODBMS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.odbms.org/odbmsblog/2008/07/01/do-you-have-an-impedance-mismatch-problem-users-speak-up/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have started a new series of interviews with users of technologies for storing and handling persistent objects, around the globe. Here I define &#8220;users&#8221; in a very broad sense, including: CTOs, Technical Directors, Software Architects, Consultants, Developers, Researchers. I have asked 5 questions: Q1. Please explain briefly what are your application domains and your [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2008/07/do-you-have-impedance-mismatch-problem/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Java Object Persistence: State of the Union PART II Published</title>
		<link>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2008/05/java-object-persistence-state-of-union/</link>
		<comments>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2008/05/java-object-persistence-state-of-union/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 22:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Roberto V. Zicari</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Java Object Persistence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[object persistence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.odbms.org/odbmsblog/2008/05/15/java-object-persistence-state-of-the-union-part-ii-published/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More on the topic of Java Object Persistence &#8230; I have this time interviewed the following ODBMS.ORG experts Jose Blakeley (Microsoft), Rick Cattell (Sun Microsystems), William Cook (University of Texas at Austin), Robert Green (Versant) , and Alan Santos (Progress). The panel addressed the ever open issue of the impedance mismatch, a problem which has [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2008/05/java-object-persistence-state-of-union/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Java Object Persistence: State of the Union Published</title>
		<link>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2008/04/java-object-persistence-state-of-union-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2008/04/java-object-persistence-state-of-union-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 08:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Roberto V. Zicari</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Java Object Persistence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[object persistence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.odbms.org/odbmsblog/2008/04/02/java-object-persistence-state-of-the-union-published/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The topic of Java Object Persistence is as actual as ever&#8230; I have therefore interviewed together with InfoQ.com&#8217;s Floyd Marinescu the following group of leading persistence solution architects on their views on the current State of the Union of object persistence with respect to Java: Mike Keith: EJB co-spec lead, main architect of Oracle Toplink [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2008/04/java-object-persistence-state-of-union-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Java Object Persistence: State of the Union</title>
		<link>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2008/03/java-object-persistence-state-of-the-union/</link>
		<comments>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2008/03/java-object-persistence-state-of-the-union/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 00:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Roberto V. Zicari</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Java Object Persistence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[object persistence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.odbms.org/odbmsblog/2008/03/04/java-object-persistence-state-of-the-union/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have been working together with Floyd Marinescu, editor of InfoQ.com, and produced a virtual panel asking a group of leading persistence solution architects their views on the current state of the union in persistence in the Java community. The Panelists we interviewed are: - Mike Keith : EJB co-spec lead, main architect of Oracle [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2008/03/java-object-persistence-state-of-the-union/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

