<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ODBMS Industry Watch &#187; OMG</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.odbms.org/blog/tag/omg/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.odbms.org/blog</link>
	<description>Trends and Information on Objects and Databases, Object Persistence, Innovation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 08:16:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>OMG ODBTWG  next steps</title>
		<link>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2008/12/omg-odbtwg-next-steps/</link>
		<comments>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2008/12/omg-odbtwg-next-steps/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 08:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Roberto V. Zicari</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ODBMS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ODBTWG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OMG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.odbms.org/odbmsblog/2008/12/16/omg-odbtwg-next-steps/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a short note related to the OMG ODBTWG meeting, on December 9, 2008.
During the meeting there was a consensus that the OMG&#8217;s Semantic Meta Object Facility (“semantic MOF” or “S-MOF”) would be a good place to start for the object model in the Object Database Standard RFP.
Mike Card is planning to publish a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2008/12/omg-odbtwg-next-steps/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>OMG is hosting an Object Database Standard Definition Scope meeting in Santa Clara</title>
		<link>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2008/12/omg-is-hosting-object-database-standard/</link>
		<comments>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2008/12/omg-is-hosting-object-database-standard/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 06:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Roberto V. Zicari</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ODBMS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ODBMS.ORG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OMG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.odbms.org/odbmsblog/2008/12/05/omg-is-hosting-an-object-database-standard-definition-scope-meeting-in-santa-clara/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have received a note from Mike Card that I would like to share with you.  
&#8220;The OMG is hosting an Object Database Standard Definition Scope meeting in Santa Clara, CA at the Hyatt Regency on Tuesday afternoon, December 9th. 
The purpose of this meeting will be to define what the scope of the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2008/12/omg-is-hosting-object-database-standard/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LINQ: the best option for a future Java query API?</title>
		<link>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2008/10/is-really-linq-best-option-for-future/</link>
		<comments>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2008/10/is-really-linq-best-option-for-future/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 04:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Roberto V. Zicari</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LINQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ODBMS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ODBTWG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OMG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.odbms.org/odbmsblog/2008/10/07/linq-the-best-option-for-a-future-java-query-api/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My interview to Mike Card has triggered an intense discussion (still ongoing), on the pros and cons of considering LINQ as the best option for a future Java query API. 
There is a consensus that a common query mechanism for odbms is needed. 
However, there is quite a disagreement on how this should be done. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2008/10/is-really-linq-best-option-for-future/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LINQ is the best option for a future Java query API</title>
		<link>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2008/08/linq-is-best-option-for-future-java/</link>
		<comments>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2008/08/linq-is-best-option-for-future-java/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 12:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Roberto V. Zicari</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LINQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ODBMS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ODBTWG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OMG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.odbms.org/odbmsblog/2008/08/27/linq-is-the-best-option-for-a-future-java-query-api/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A conversation with Mike Card.
I have interviewed Mike Card on the latest development of the OMG working group which aims at defining a new standards for Object Database Systems.
Mike works with Syracuse Research Corporation (SRC) and is involved in object databases and their application to challenging problems, including pattern recognition. He chairs the ODBT group [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2008/08/linq-is-best-option-for-future-java/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>72</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Object Database Systems: Quo vadis?</title>
		<link>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2008/05/object-database-systems-quo-vadis/</link>
		<comments>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2008/05/object-database-systems-quo-vadis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 09:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Roberto V. Zicari</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ODBMS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OMG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.odbms.org/odbmsblog/2008/05/20/object-database-systems-quo-vadis/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wanted to have an opinion on some critical questions related to Object Databases:

Where are Object Database Systems going? Are Relational database systems becoming Object Databases? Do we need a standard for Object Databases? Why ODMG did not succeed?
I have therefore interviewed one of our Experts, Mike Card , on his view on the current [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2008/05/object-database-systems-quo-vadis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>News from the OMG Object Database Technology Users and Vendors</title>
		<link>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2008/02/news-from-omg-object-database/</link>
		<comments>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2008/02/news-from-omg-object-database/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 02:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Roberto V. Zicari</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ODBTWG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OMG]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.odbms.org/odbmsblog/2008/02/06/news-from-the-omg-object-database-technology-users-and-vendors/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have received some information from Mrs. Charlotte W. Wales (The MITRE Corporation) related to the OMG Object Database Technology Users and Vendors Roundtable, which took place on 11 December 2007 at the OMG meeting in Burlingame, CA. I have listed it below as I have received it.
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;
News from OMG Object Database Technology Users and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2008/02/news-from-omg-object-database/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Standards for Object Databases?</title>
		<link>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2007/12/what-standards-for-object-databases/</link>
		<comments>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2007/12/what-standards-for-object-databases/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 11:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Roberto V. Zicari</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ODBTWG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OMG]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.odbms.org/odbmsblog/2007/12/19/what-standards-for-object-databases/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I thought it would be interested to give you an insight of the discussion currently going on at ODBMS.ORG. The issue is what Standards for Object Databases?Here are two notes, one from Wiliam Cook  and one from Mike Card.
A copy of the  OMG white paper on Next-Generation Object Database Standardization written by the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2007/12/what-standards-for-object-databases/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tuesday, December 12, OMG Object Database Technology Users  and Vendors Roundtable</title>
		<link>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2007/12/tuesday-december-12-omg-object-database/</link>
		<comments>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2007/12/tuesday-december-12-omg-object-database/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 03:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Roberto V. Zicari</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ODBTWG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OMG]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.odbms.org/odbmsblog/2007/12/03/tuesday-december-12-omg-object-database-technology-users-and-vendors-roundtable/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For those of you interested in standards, here is an event you may want to consider attending, the:
Object Database Technology Users and Vendors Roundtable
on Tuesday, December 12, 2007 08:00-12:00 am, part of the
OMG Technical Meeting in Burlingame, CA
The Meeting is Sponsored by the OMG Middleware and Related Services Platform Task Force (MARS)
The Committee is composed [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2007/12/tuesday-december-12-omg-object-database/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How the OMG technology process works</title>
		<link>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2007/11/how-the-omg-technology-process-works/</link>
		<comments>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2007/11/how-the-omg-technology-process-works/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 08:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Roberto V. Zicari</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ODBTWG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OMG]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.odbms.org/odbmsblog/2007/11/20/how-the-omg-technology-process-works/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was asked by a number of people how the OMG standardization process works.
I have found a link to a power point presentation which explains the essence of how the OMG technology process worksand it&#8217;s the official OMG word rather than just my interpretation of it.  
Here&#8217;s the link to a Power Point presentation [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2007/11/how-the-omg-technology-process-works/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Next-Generation Object Database Standardization?</title>
		<link>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2007/10/next-generation-object-database/</link>
		<comments>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2007/10/next-generation-object-database/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 00:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Roberto V. Zicari</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ODBTWG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ODMG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OMG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.odbms.org/odbmsblog/2007/10/05/next-generation-object-database-standardization/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I will be shortly publish in ODBMS.ORG a white paper on Next-Generation Object Database Standardization written by the OMG`s Object Database Technology Working Group.
Here is the abstract of the White Paper:
&#8220;Following the dissolution of the Object Data Management Group (ODMG) in 2001, standardization efforts for object databases languished. What has emerged since is a fractured [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2007/10/next-generation-object-database/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
