<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ODBMS Industry Watch &#187; OMG</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.odbms.org/blog/tag/omg/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.odbms.org/blog</link>
	<description>Trends and Information on New Data Management Technologies, Innovation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 11:46:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>How good is UML for Database Design?  Interview with Michael Blaha.</title>
		<link>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2011/07/how-good-is-uml-for-database-design-interview-with-michael-blaha/</link>
		<comments>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2011/07/how-good-is-uml-for-database-design-interview-with-michael-blaha/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 06:28:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Roberto V. Zicari</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conceptual data modeling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Database Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Blaha]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[object databases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OMG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[relational databases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UML]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unified Modeling Language]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.odbms.org/blog/?p=1009</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[„ The tools are not good at taking changes to a model and generating incremental design code to alter a populated database.”&#8211; Michael Blaha The Unified Modeling Language™ &#8211; UML &#8211; is OMG&#8217;s most-used specification. UML is a de facto standard for object modeling, and it is often used for database design as well. But [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2011/07/how-good-is-uml-for-database-design-interview-with-michael-blaha/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Do we really need a standard for Object Databases?</title>
		<link>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2009/04/do-we-really-need-standard-for-object/</link>
		<comments>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2009/04/do-we-really-need-standard-for-object/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 08:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Roberto V. Zicari</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OMG]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.odbms.org/odbmsblog/2009/04/17/do-we-really-need-a-standard-for-object-databases/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you recall, in February 2006, the Object Management Group (OMG) has decided to develop the &#8220;4th generation&#8221; standard for object databases in order to facilitate broader adoption of standards-based object database technology. To this end, the OMG had set up the Object Database Technology Working Group (ODBT WG) and acquired the rights to develop [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2009/04/do-we-really-need-standard-for-object/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>OMG ODBTWG  next steps</title>
		<link>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2008/12/omg-odbtwg-next-steps/</link>
		<comments>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2008/12/omg-odbtwg-next-steps/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 08:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Roberto V. Zicari</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ODBMS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ODBTWG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OMG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.odbms.org/odbmsblog/2008/12/16/omg-odbtwg-next-steps/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a short note related to the OMG ODBTWG meeting, on December 9, 2008. During the meeting there was a consensus that the OMG&#8217;s Semantic Meta Object Facility (“semantic MOF” or “S-MOF”) would be a good place to start for the object model in the Object Database Standard RFP. Mike Card is planning to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2008/12/omg-odbtwg-next-steps/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>OMG is hosting an Object Database Standard Definition Scope meeting in Santa Clara</title>
		<link>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2008/12/omg-is-hosting-object-database-standard/</link>
		<comments>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2008/12/omg-is-hosting-object-database-standard/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 06:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Roberto V. Zicari</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ODBMS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ODBMS.ORG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OMG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.odbms.org/odbmsblog/2008/12/05/omg-is-hosting-an-object-database-standard-definition-scope-meeting-in-santa-clara/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have received a note from Mike Card that I would like to share with you. &#8220;The OMG is hosting an Object Database Standard Definition Scope meeting in Santa Clara, CA at the Hyatt Regency on Tuesday afternoon, December 9th. The purpose of this meeting will be to define what the scope of the new [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2008/12/omg-is-hosting-object-database-standard/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LINQ: the best option for a future Java query API?</title>
		<link>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2008/10/is-really-linq-best-option-for-future/</link>
		<comments>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2008/10/is-really-linq-best-option-for-future/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 04:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Roberto V. Zicari</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Java Object Persistence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LINQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ODBMS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ODBTWG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OMG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.odbms.org/odbmsblog/2008/10/07/linq-the-best-option-for-a-future-java-query-api/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My interview to Mike Card has triggered an intense discussion (still ongoing), on the pros and cons of considering LINQ as the best option for a future Java query API. There is a consensus that a common query mechanism for odbms is needed. However, there is quite a disagreement on how this should be done. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2008/10/is-really-linq-best-option-for-future/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LINQ is the best option for a future Java query API</title>
		<link>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2008/08/linq-is-best-option-for-future-java/</link>
		<comments>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2008/08/linq-is-best-option-for-future-java/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 12:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Roberto V. Zicari</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LINQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ODBMS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ODBTWG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OMG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.odbms.org/odbmsblog/2008/08/27/linq-is-the-best-option-for-a-future-java-query-api/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A conversation with Mike Card. I have interviewed Mike Card on the latest development of the OMG working group which aims at defining a new standards for Object Database Systems. Mike works with Syracuse Research Corporation (SRC) and is involved in object databases and their application to challenging problems, including pattern recognition. He chairs the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2008/08/linq-is-best-option-for-future-java/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>72</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Object Database Systems: Quo vadis?</title>
		<link>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2008/05/object-database-systems-quo-vadis/</link>
		<comments>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2008/05/object-database-systems-quo-vadis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 09:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Roberto V. Zicari</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ODBMS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OMG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.odbms.org/odbmsblog/2008/05/20/object-database-systems-quo-vadis/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wanted to have an opinion on some critical questions related to Object Databases: Where are Object Database Systems going? Are Relational database systems becoming Object Databases? Do we need a standard for Object Databases? Why ODMG did not succeed? I have therefore interviewed one of our Experts, Mike Card , on his view on [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2008/05/object-database-systems-quo-vadis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>News from the OMG Object Database Technology Users and Vendors</title>
		<link>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2008/02/news-from-omg-object-database/</link>
		<comments>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2008/02/news-from-omg-object-database/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 02:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Roberto V. Zicari</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ODBTWG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OMG]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.odbms.org/odbmsblog/2008/02/06/news-from-the-omg-object-database-technology-users-and-vendors/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have received some information from Mrs. Charlotte W. Wales (The MITRE Corporation) related to the OMG Object Database Technology Users and Vendors Roundtable, which took place on 11 December 2007 at the OMG meeting in Burlingame, CA. I have listed it below as I have received it. &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211; News from OMG Object Database Technology [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2008/02/news-from-omg-object-database/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Standards for Object Databases?</title>
		<link>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2007/12/what-standards-for-object-databases/</link>
		<comments>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2007/12/what-standards-for-object-databases/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 11:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Roberto V. Zicari</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ODBTWG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OMG]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.odbms.org/odbmsblog/2007/12/19/what-standards-for-object-databases/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I thought it would be interested to give you an insight of the discussion currently going on at ODBMS.ORG. The issue is what Standards for Object Databases?Here are two notes, one from Wiliam Cook and one from Mike Card. A copy of the OMG white paper on Next-Generation Object Database Standardization written by the OMG`s [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2007/12/what-standards-for-object-databases/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tuesday, December 12, OMG Object Database Technology Users  and Vendors Roundtable</title>
		<link>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2007/12/tuesday-december-12-omg-object-database/</link>
		<comments>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2007/12/tuesday-december-12-omg-object-database/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 03:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Roberto V. Zicari</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ODBTWG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OMG]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.odbms.org/odbmsblog/2007/12/03/tuesday-december-12-omg-object-database-technology-users-and-vendors-roundtable/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For those of you interested in standards, here is an event you may want to consider attending, the: Object Database Technology Users and Vendors Roundtable on Tuesday, December 12, 2007 08:00-12:00 am, part of the OMG Technical Meeting in Burlingame, CA The Meeting is Sponsored by the OMG Middleware and Related Services Platform Task Force [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2007/12/tuesday-december-12-omg-object-database/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

