<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ODBMS Industry Watch &#187; standards</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.odbms.org/blog/tag/standards/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.odbms.org/blog</link>
	<description>Trends and Information on New Data Management Technologies, Innovation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 11:46:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>On Versant`s technology. Interview with Vishal Bagga.</title>
		<link>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2011/08/on-versants-technology-interview-with-vishal-bagga/</link>
		<comments>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2011/08/on-versants-technology-interview-with-vishal-bagga/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 13:53:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Roberto V. Zicari</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[db4o]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[db4objects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hadoop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HBase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JSON]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MessagePack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nosql databases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ODBMS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pig]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[relational databases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Versant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vishal Bagga]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.odbms.org/blog/?p=1077</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“We believe that data only becomes useful once it becomes structured.” &#8211; Vishal Bagga There is a lot of discussion on NoSQL databases nowdays. But what about object databases? I asked a few questions to Vishal Bagga, Senior Product Manager at Versant. RVZ Q1. How has Versant&#8217;s technology evolved over the past three years? Vishal [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2011/08/on-versants-technology-interview-with-vishal-bagga/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ODBMS.ORG Useful Links</title>
		<link>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2009/02/odbmsorg-useful-links/</link>
		<comments>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2009/02/odbmsorg-useful-links/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 04:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Roberto V. Zicari</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[object persistence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ODBMS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ODBMS.ORG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ODBTWG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.odbms.org/odbmsblog/2009/02/09/odbms-org-useful-links/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since we started up in September 2005, ODBMS.ORG has grown quite a bit. A lot of free resources have been added in the course of the years. I thought it could be useful to give you a few links to easy your search for useful resources&#8230;. Here we are: If you are interested in Lecture [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2009/02/odbmsorg-useful-links/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>OMG ODBTWG  next steps</title>
		<link>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2008/12/omg-odbtwg-next-steps/</link>
		<comments>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2008/12/omg-odbtwg-next-steps/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 08:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Roberto V. Zicari</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ODBMS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ODBTWG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OMG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.odbms.org/odbmsblog/2008/12/16/omg-odbtwg-next-steps/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a short note related to the OMG ODBTWG meeting, on December 9, 2008. During the meeting there was a consensus that the OMG&#8217;s Semantic Meta Object Facility (“semantic MOF” or “S-MOF”) would be a good place to start for the object model in the Object Database Standard RFP. Mike Card is planning to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2008/12/omg-odbtwg-next-steps/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>OMG is hosting an Object Database Standard Definition Scope meeting in Santa Clara</title>
		<link>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2008/12/omg-is-hosting-object-database-standard/</link>
		<comments>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2008/12/omg-is-hosting-object-database-standard/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 06:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Roberto V. Zicari</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ODBMS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ODBMS.ORG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OMG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.odbms.org/odbmsblog/2008/12/05/omg-is-hosting-an-object-database-standard-definition-scope-meeting-in-santa-clara/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have received a note from Mike Card that I would like to share with you. &#8220;The OMG is hosting an Object Database Standard Definition Scope meeting in Santa Clara, CA at the Hyatt Regency on Tuesday afternoon, December 9th. The purpose of this meeting will be to define what the scope of the new [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2008/12/omg-is-hosting-object-database-standard/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>O/R Impedance Mismatch? Users Speak Up! Third Series of User Reports published.</title>
		<link>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2008/10/or-impedance-mismatch-users-speak-up-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2008/10/or-impedance-mismatch-users-speak-up-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 02:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Roberto V. Zicari</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impedence mismatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Java Object Persistence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[object persistence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ODBMS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.odbms.org/odbmsblog/2008/10/23/or-impedance-mismatch-users-speak-up-third-series-of-user-reports-published/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have published the third series of user reports on using technologies for storing and handling persistent objects.I have defined &#8220;users&#8221; in a very broad sense, including: CTOs, Technical Directors, Software Architects, Consultants, Developers, and Researchers. The third series includes 7 new user reports from the following users:- Peter Train, Architect, Standard Bank Group Limited, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2008/10/or-impedance-mismatch-users-speak-up-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LINQ: the best option for a future Java query API?</title>
		<link>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2008/10/is-really-linq-best-option-for-future/</link>
		<comments>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2008/10/is-really-linq-best-option-for-future/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 04:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Roberto V. Zicari</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Java Object Persistence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LINQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ODBMS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ODBTWG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OMG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.odbms.org/odbmsblog/2008/10/07/linq-the-best-option-for-a-future-java-query-api/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My interview to Mike Card has triggered an intense discussion (still ongoing), on the pros and cons of considering LINQ as the best option for a future Java query API. There is a consensus that a common query mechanism for odbms is needed. However, there is quite a disagreement on how this should be done. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2008/10/is-really-linq-best-option-for-future/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Do you have an impedance mismatch problem? Users speak up! Second series of user reports published.</title>
		<link>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2008/09/second-series-of-user-reports-published/</link>
		<comments>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2008/09/second-series-of-user-reports-published/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 05:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Roberto V. Zicari</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impedence mismatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[object persistence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ODBMS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.odbms.org/odbmsblog/2008/09/04/do-you-have-an-impedance-mismatch-problem-users-speak-up-second-series-of-user-reports-published/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have started a new series of interviews with users of technologies for storing and handling persistent objects, around the globe. 6 additional user reports (12-17/08) have been published, from the following users: Ajay Deshpande, Persistent Horst Braeuner, City of Schwaebisch Hall Tore Risch, Uppsala University Michael Blaha, OMT Associates Stefan Keller, HSR Rapperswil Mohammed [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2008/09/second-series-of-user-reports-published/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LINQ is the best option for a future Java query API</title>
		<link>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2008/08/linq-is-best-option-for-future-java/</link>
		<comments>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2008/08/linq-is-best-option-for-future-java/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 12:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Roberto V. Zicari</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LINQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ODBMS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ODBTWG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OMG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.odbms.org/odbmsblog/2008/08/27/linq-is-the-best-option-for-a-future-java-query-api/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A conversation with Mike Card. I have interviewed Mike Card on the latest development of the OMG working group which aims at defining a new standards for Object Database Systems. Mike works with Syracuse Research Corporation (SRC) and is involved in object databases and their application to challenging problems, including pattern recognition. He chairs the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2008/08/linq-is-best-option-for-future-java/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>72</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Do you have an impedance mismatch problem? Users speak up!</title>
		<link>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2008/07/do-you-have-impedance-mismatch-problem/</link>
		<comments>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2008/07/do-you-have-impedance-mismatch-problem/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 01:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Roberto V. Zicari</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impedence mismatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[object persistence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ODBMS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.odbms.org/odbmsblog/2008/07/01/do-you-have-an-impedance-mismatch-problem-users-speak-up/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have started a new series of interviews with users of technologies for storing and handling persistent objects, around the globe. Here I define &#8220;users&#8221; in a very broad sense, including: CTOs, Technical Directors, Software Architects, Consultants, Developers, Researchers. I have asked 5 questions: Q1. Please explain briefly what are your application domains and your [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2008/07/do-you-have-impedance-mismatch-problem/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Object Database Systems: Quo vadis?</title>
		<link>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2008/05/object-database-systems-quo-vadis/</link>
		<comments>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2008/05/object-database-systems-quo-vadis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 09:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Roberto V. Zicari</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ODBMS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OMG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.odbms.org/odbmsblog/2008/05/20/object-database-systems-quo-vadis/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wanted to have an opinion on some critical questions related to Object Databases: Where are Object Database Systems going? Are Relational database systems becoming Object Databases? Do we need a standard for Object Databases? Why ODMG did not succeed? I have therefore interviewed one of our Experts, Mike Card , on his view on [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.odbms.org/blog/2008/05/object-database-systems-quo-vadis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

